1971 Challenger Convertible
- Thread starter Plowman
- Start date
FY1TopBanana
Well-Known Member
You have seen such a fender tag/build sheet?
A non-RT with N96 would be an oddity: either 70 or 71 although in 71 theoretically they were clear of the underbrace crashworthy issue. In a vert - really obscure.
In prod numbers from the data that I have (Ganat, others) the non-RT V8s are lumped. So in non-RT V8 the 318, 340, and 383 2 bbl and hipo variants would be lumped.
As you describe the car it would be VERY low to single-digit production in 71.
A non-RT with N96 would be an oddity: either 70 or 71 although in 71 theoretically they were clear of the underbrace crashworthy issue. In a vert - really obscure.
In prod numbers from the data that I have (Ganat, others) the non-RT V8s are lumped. So in non-RT V8 the 318, 340, and 383 2 bbl and hipo variants would be lumped.
As you describe the car it would be VERY low to single-digit production in 71.
Last edited:
FY1TopBanana
Well-Known Member
A Hemmings article on a 71 with a 340 and N96 from Jan 2021 states:
"The next week I went to the Mopar Nationals and asked the judges about this car. They were all intrigued by my find and one told me that they only made 72 non-R/T Shakers in 1971 [including 340 and 383 engines].
terrywalker
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2013
- Messages
- 553
- Reaction score
- 366
I have a 340 convertible 71 Challenger with Shaker and have seen a couple more and one 383 convertible 71 Challenger shaker. All 71 convertibles are non-R/Ts.
Terry W.
Terry W.
Last edited:
DetMatt1
Well-Known Member
I’m sure most know but there were no JS27 cars at all in ‘71 so all verts were non R/T.
terrywalker
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2013
- Messages
- 553
- Reaction score
- 366
I see only two with the four spd
FY1TopBanana
Well-Known Member
Outstanding find. Rare doesn't describe it.
MarkLevi
Active Member
Pictures, please, good sir! 
Mine may wind up a shaker some day - but it sure didn't leave the factory that way!
Mine may wind up a shaker some day - but it sure didn't leave the factory that way!
I help Gilmore Car Museum with their muscle car display and is not mine so I will not post a picture without permission from the owner. sorryPictures, please, good sir!
Mine may wind up a shaker some day - but it sure didn't leave the factory that way!
MarkLevi
Active Member
All good. I found a video with it on Youtube. V2 Hemi Orange with a white interior and a silver shaker bubble?
Thanks
Mark
Thanks
Mark
Yea, but that’s no it
MarkLevi
Active Member
Way cool - they have multiples! How many? E-Body convertible shakers are few and far between! (factory ones, anyway)
M
MarkLevi
Active Member
Black
831 HQT
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2016
- Messages
- 56
- Reaction score
- 64
DetMatt1
Well-Known Member
I see zero proof that that’s a ‘71 JS27 car. They just plain didn’t make even 1. Somehow Hollywood got Chrysler to do some strange things in those years. Are you going to show me the clip with a ‘72 Challenger vert and say maybe Chrysler made a few early ones? That’s slightly different I know but it’s also not.And how about that one?
Dodge Challenger R/T in "Columbo: Death Lends a Hand"
www.imcdb.org
831 HQT
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2016
- Messages
- 56
- Reaction score
- 64
Yes, of course, the picture doesn't proof it's a '71 JS27 car.
But unless we see that car's VIN / Fender tag we just can't tell, right?
To say it with the words of the canadian guy:
'Makes you wonder whether Chrysler slipped a few R/T convertibles out the door in '71 before pulling their availability?'
The '72 E-Body verts is a different story. It's clearly proven that those are the very early '71 models already available to the studios, simply converted to look like '72 models.
Similar threads
