ramenth
Well-Known Member
Recently there was a thread started on one of our sister sites comparing the viewership there as to the viewership here. The comment was made about how many members and guest were online at the same time as here.
The thread immediately devolved into an E-body and E-body owners bash thread.
I'm sorry, I have issues with threads like this and folks who join in on it.
The typical response is about how one Mopar is superior to another. Theirs', of course, being the "superior" model. And I don't make that comment as a slam to the cars they drive, but rather to highlight how the respondents placed that label.
The stereotypical E-body owner, to them, is an arrogant rich guy, polishing a '71 Hemicuda convertible with a diaper, behind ropes so that the unwashed masses can't get within ten feet of the car. In truth I've met one - one - such owner at Carlisle back in '96. And his wasn't a Hemi car, yet was a multiple magazine featured, one-of-one '70 Challenger R/T convertible.
On our sister site I've seen folks build projects on a budget, just as here. I've seen folks build a lifelong dream, just as here. I'm seen folks work toward bringing back to life cars which have been with them for years, just as here. So how does this substantiate to make us "outsiders" looking in on a hobby of which we've been accused of ruining?
Yet, for all our supposed arrogance as E-body owners - all of our snobbishness, supposedly all of our superiority to other Mopar owners - I don't see anyone on this site chiming in to bash the other models. (And we won't as long as I'm a mod here.) Yet for the way we're portrayed they're acting in the manner of which they accuse us.
I don't understand this. I don't see Camaro owners bashing on Chevelle owners. I don't see Mustang owners bashing on Torino owners.
As a matter of fact, when a subforum dedicated to another body style was offered up on our sister site these same folks crawled out of the woodwork to dismiss as inferior the other body style and it's derivatives. Yet we're the ones being accused as being arrogant and having a "superior" attitude.
As an M-body owner I've been told that the E-body guys will ignore me and the B-body guys won't talk to me, by someone who's never had any interaction of this site, or I highly consider, never actually had any interaction with E and B-body guys to begin with. The joke was on him, of course, as it's well known that as an M-body guy I'm also an E- and a B-body guy. Hell, I guess I'm just a Mopar guy. If you look at my sig you'll see I currently have damned near the alphabet going as far as projects. Those I don't have now I've owned in the past: C's, F's, D's, even a K mixed in. I like Mopars. Each has strength and weaknesses, which can be exploited and overcome.
I'm sorry, I'm not rich. I own my own business in which there are historic dry spells that I have to use my profits during the year to offset. Sometimes that means no money for the projects. I have to save for every part I can find and plan for the budget on the build to be able to get the parts I need. Trust me, folks, if I was rich the E-body would be stalking Ferrari's now, not sometime in the future.
We've been accused of "ruining the hobby" with our "money," but I see the popularity of the E-body as having bolstered the Mopar hobby. For those of you who have tried to restore or build an A-body back in the days before the musclecar boom of the '80's you'll know what I mean. Back in the late '80's, early '90's you'll remember the only piece of sheetmetal that was available was the spare tire well. The odd vendor might have slip-on rocker panel skins, but that was it. The popularity of the E-body has given rise to vendors like AMD and Goodmark who are making more sheetmetal available, for just about every musclecar era Mopar than there ever has been. I'm not saying this to justify the attitude of "I have an E-body and you don't so there" of which we've been accused, but to point out the economics of the hobby. Hell, there's a lot more sheetmetal available now for A's and B's than there was for the E-bodies back when my dad bought the '74 in the early '90's. How is that "ruining the hobby?"
Most of the E-body guys I've met and had direct transactions with are humble, willing to help, full of love for the hobby, and love for his car. Sound familiar?
Sorry for the rant, folks, but things like this get to me. I'm never a fan of someone accusing me of being something I'm not, while in the process the accuser is displaying tendencies of being what he's accusing me of being.
The thread immediately devolved into an E-body and E-body owners bash thread.
I'm sorry, I have issues with threads like this and folks who join in on it.
The typical response is about how one Mopar is superior to another. Theirs', of course, being the "superior" model. And I don't make that comment as a slam to the cars they drive, but rather to highlight how the respondents placed that label.
The stereotypical E-body owner, to them, is an arrogant rich guy, polishing a '71 Hemicuda convertible with a diaper, behind ropes so that the unwashed masses can't get within ten feet of the car. In truth I've met one - one - such owner at Carlisle back in '96. And his wasn't a Hemi car, yet was a multiple magazine featured, one-of-one '70 Challenger R/T convertible.
On our sister site I've seen folks build projects on a budget, just as here. I've seen folks build a lifelong dream, just as here. I'm seen folks work toward bringing back to life cars which have been with them for years, just as here. So how does this substantiate to make us "outsiders" looking in on a hobby of which we've been accused of ruining?
Yet, for all our supposed arrogance as E-body owners - all of our snobbishness, supposedly all of our superiority to other Mopar owners - I don't see anyone on this site chiming in to bash the other models. (And we won't as long as I'm a mod here.) Yet for the way we're portrayed they're acting in the manner of which they accuse us.
I don't understand this. I don't see Camaro owners bashing on Chevelle owners. I don't see Mustang owners bashing on Torino owners.
As a matter of fact, when a subforum dedicated to another body style was offered up on our sister site these same folks crawled out of the woodwork to dismiss as inferior the other body style and it's derivatives. Yet we're the ones being accused as being arrogant and having a "superior" attitude.
As an M-body owner I've been told that the E-body guys will ignore me and the B-body guys won't talk to me, by someone who's never had any interaction of this site, or I highly consider, never actually had any interaction with E and B-body guys to begin with. The joke was on him, of course, as it's well known that as an M-body guy I'm also an E- and a B-body guy. Hell, I guess I'm just a Mopar guy. If you look at my sig you'll see I currently have damned near the alphabet going as far as projects. Those I don't have now I've owned in the past: C's, F's, D's, even a K mixed in. I like Mopars. Each has strength and weaknesses, which can be exploited and overcome.
I'm sorry, I'm not rich. I own my own business in which there are historic dry spells that I have to use my profits during the year to offset. Sometimes that means no money for the projects. I have to save for every part I can find and plan for the budget on the build to be able to get the parts I need. Trust me, folks, if I was rich the E-body would be stalking Ferrari's now, not sometime in the future.
We've been accused of "ruining the hobby" with our "money," but I see the popularity of the E-body as having bolstered the Mopar hobby. For those of you who have tried to restore or build an A-body back in the days before the musclecar boom of the '80's you'll know what I mean. Back in the late '80's, early '90's you'll remember the only piece of sheetmetal that was available was the spare tire well. The odd vendor might have slip-on rocker panel skins, but that was it. The popularity of the E-body has given rise to vendors like AMD and Goodmark who are making more sheetmetal available, for just about every musclecar era Mopar than there ever has been. I'm not saying this to justify the attitude of "I have an E-body and you don't so there" of which we've been accused, but to point out the economics of the hobby. Hell, there's a lot more sheetmetal available now for A's and B's than there was for the E-bodies back when my dad bought the '74 in the early '90's. How is that "ruining the hobby?"
Most of the E-body guys I've met and had direct transactions with are humble, willing to help, full of love for the hobby, and love for his car. Sound familiar?
Sorry for the rant, folks, but things like this get to me. I'm never a fan of someone accusing me of being something I'm not, while in the process the accuser is displaying tendencies of being what he's accusing me of being.