Hot off the dinner table !
Just as I was about to completely give up on this car, I was shown a ray of lite.
So this is the way it was explained to me;
We might be looking at this car the wrong way. Its not a big block car because it didn't need to be!.
According to my dad, chrysler has always had more horse sense than anybody else in the industry. They understood the movie very well, right from the get go, In fact.
Chrysler knew that vanishing point was a car movie with lots of stunts, some of which were just too dangerous. So beside the 3 RT challengers, they probably gave the film company a couple of less expensive cars for trying out and perfectionating ( that's my dad's lingo) the crazy stunts at low speeds first and then if they didn't flip the car end to end, then they would try it with the "hero" car. This way, by the time the cameras were roling, the car didn't look too banged up.
This makes perfect sense,. Imagine going to the production manager and telling him you flipped the RT today,
Yeah baby, he will love that!
This explains the fact that there were 5 cars salvaged and not 3.
This philosophy of minimizing damage is clearly evident. Even in the most important clip, the ramming of the bulldozers, they used a camaro in the crash and not a Challenger.
So my folks think that it's completely reasonable to say that the car is not one of the vanishing point RTs, but it could still be possible that it is one of the 5 vanishing point cars.
Could we ad a zero to the price now?