"Thus turning a car into a rare low numbers car if that wasent true the cause and effect
wouldn't of been introduced in science class..lol"
" I suppose chrysler
shouldn't of bothered stamping the vin on the 3 speed transmission"
Now, English is not my first language,(that's why It sounds lofty, sorry) so i do make mistakes, but the above is your writing, your grammar is systematically defficient,
Get your tuition refunded for sure.
Nocar340, you hit it on the head, thanks
I had a tag made for my 70 Challenger, generally it was/is very accurate except the color of the car. It was originally a EK2 car but I changed it to EV2. I have had a couple "experts" look at it and at first glance they didn't notice anything off, but the order date is wrong and after a minute or 2 they ask if the tag is a repop which I say it is. One guy then wrinkled his nose up and walked away but the other 2 guys that have seen it comment that its is pretty good overall. Point being that there isn't anything on the tag that isn't on the car and the fact is that if you know what you are looking at you can usually tell if the car was made for most of the more notable options.
On that note I am going to make tags for the rest of my cars and make up options for what the car has, like on my Cuda which has a 416 ci engine, that will be the code of the engine (even though the VIN will clearly show 318). I will invent a code for the 4 link rear, AAR hood, etc. Now if someone looks at the tag and thinks it is all original they need to take up golf or hire someone to tell them its a hot rod not a restoration but I will be happy (and proud) to tell anyone that I built it.
View attachment 80013
Really like your cuda,two tone colors make it look like one bad fish..