Chryco Psycho
Well-Known Member
Sure , Happy to !
There is a lot to this , Mopar uses a larger diameter lifter which is a big advantage IF you design the cam to take advantage of it so the cam can ramp open & closed much faster without getting to the edge of the lifter . Comp designs are mostly based on Chev lobes using a smaller diameter lifter so the advantage is lost . In fact i Have seen the exact same cam spec on chev & Dodge cam grinds . By using the Mopar specific lobes I have been able to run solid flat tappet cams that are similar to smaller solid rollers cams without the expense . Even when the cam specs are similar you are only looking at 1 point on the lobe not the whole curve up & down , for example 240* @.050 , ok so .050 from closed the duration is 240* but what happens between .050 lift & .340 lift , how fast is the valve opened or closed ? This makes a huge difference as the longer the valve is opened the more air flow in & out & the motor is Only an air pump so more air = more power !
Back in the 80s there was a cam company called Ultradyne , & a man named Harold who designed those cams using the advantage of the wider lifter , later when Ultradyne closed down Lunati hired Harold & redesigned all of there cams thus the Voodoo line of cams . For example I often used a TF57 lobe which was 252* @ .050 duration with .578 lift in street engines & it was awesome , for example I built a 440/512 using 2 lobes , the exhaust was using this lobe & I was able to get 660 Grosshp [1970 rating ] while getting 17.9 mpg at 75 mph
Other cam companies have also used this wide lifter advantage in their cam designs Engle & Hughes come to mind & truely max out the advantage .
I have dynoed a lot of engines & the cam is really the most critical part of any build & the Mopars running Comp cams tend to be generally down on power & often significantly as in sometimes 30% .
SO if you spend all of the $$ to build an engine why throw away power that really costs no more , it is not like Comp cams are 1/2 the price of a Lunati !
Questions Please ask .... I am happy to share & If you feel I have helped I also accept donations .
I am also happy to call you & discuss things if that helps .
There is a lot to this , Mopar uses a larger diameter lifter which is a big advantage IF you design the cam to take advantage of it so the cam can ramp open & closed much faster without getting to the edge of the lifter . Comp designs are mostly based on Chev lobes using a smaller diameter lifter so the advantage is lost . In fact i Have seen the exact same cam spec on chev & Dodge cam grinds . By using the Mopar specific lobes I have been able to run solid flat tappet cams that are similar to smaller solid rollers cams without the expense . Even when the cam specs are similar you are only looking at 1 point on the lobe not the whole curve up & down , for example 240* @.050 , ok so .050 from closed the duration is 240* but what happens between .050 lift & .340 lift , how fast is the valve opened or closed ? This makes a huge difference as the longer the valve is opened the more air flow in & out & the motor is Only an air pump so more air = more power !
Back in the 80s there was a cam company called Ultradyne , & a man named Harold who designed those cams using the advantage of the wider lifter , later when Ultradyne closed down Lunati hired Harold & redesigned all of there cams thus the Voodoo line of cams . For example I often used a TF57 lobe which was 252* @ .050 duration with .578 lift in street engines & it was awesome , for example I built a 440/512 using 2 lobes , the exhaust was using this lobe & I was able to get 660 Grosshp [1970 rating ] while getting 17.9 mpg at 75 mph
Other cam companies have also used this wide lifter advantage in their cam designs Engle & Hughes come to mind & truely max out the advantage .
I have dynoed a lot of engines & the cam is really the most critical part of any build & the Mopars running Comp cams tend to be generally down on power & often significantly as in sometimes 30% .
SO if you spend all of the $$ to build an engine why throw away power that really costs no more , it is not like Comp cams are 1/2 the price of a Lunati !
Questions Please ask .... I am happy to share & If you feel I have helped I also accept donations .
I am also happy to call you & discuss things if that helps .
Last edited: